What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Post by **kalm** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:08 am

Hey guys, Hillary is a successful politician!

"WTF!!!!!! AGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:09 am

kalm wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
When did I say anyone is arguing?

I do detect some passive defensiveness about her.... disguised as "well, she's more qualified than the rest what with her time as the secretary of defense thingy"

"We came, we saw, he died" - pure NeoCon porn - that should erase any of those so called qualifications as much as anything else
She's a competent bureaucrat, in fact probably a fantastic one, in a corrupt system. Fun watching you guys struggle with that.

"Did he call her competent"?

There you go again.

Corrupt system or not, when you lie to cover up a mistake, there is nothing "competent" about that.

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:12 am

kalm wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
When did I say anyone is arguing?

I do detect some passive defensiveness about her.... disguised as "well, she's more qualified than the rest what with her time as the secretary of defense thingy"

"We came, we saw, he died" - pure NeoCon porn - that should erase any of those so called qualifications as much as anything else
She's a competent bureaucrat, in fact probably a fantastic one, in a corrupt system. Fun watching you guys struggle with that.

"Did he call her competent"?

Now she's competent

If she were competent all of her work emails would have been sent from ClintonHR@state-dot-gov instead of her homebrew server

The "system" you refer to is above board. She didn't work within a corrupt system- she circumvented a clean one

Post by **kalm** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:15 am

CAA Flagship wrote:
kalm wrote:
She's a competent bureaucrat, in fact probably a fantastic one, in a corrupt system. Fun watching you guys struggle with that.

"Did he call her competent"?
There you go again.

Corrupt system or not, when you lie to cover up a mistake, there is nothing "competent" about that.

It's politics, lying is a skill. It's cute that you think it isn't.

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:16 am

kalm wrote:Hey guys, Hillary is a successful politician!

"WTF!!!!!! AGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!

The Secretary of State is a public employee.

You have identified the crux of the problem, in a "monkey writing Romeo and Juliet" kind of way

Please continue with your sidelong veiled defense of Hillary- it's amusing

(especially coming from such a nuanced thoughtful moderate)

Post by **kalm** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:18 am

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:
She's a competent bureaucrat, in fact probably a fantastic one, in a corrupt system. Fun watching you guys struggle with that.

"Did he call her competent"?

Now she's competent

If she were competent all of her work emails would have been sent from ClintonHR@state-dot-gov instead of her homebrew server

The "system" you refer to is above board. She didn't work within a corrupt system- she circumvented a clean one

The system (I was referring to big picture which I know you sometimes struggle with) begs for dishonesty. See my reply to Flaggy.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:18 am

kalm wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: There you go again.

Corrupt system or not, when you lie to cover up a mistake, there is nothing "competent" about that.
It's politics, lying is a skill. It's cute that you think it isn't.

No. Spinning and deflecting is a skill. Lying is easy.

Post by **Ivytalk** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:18 am

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:Hey guys, Hillary is a successful politician!

"WTF!!!!!! AGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!

The Secretary of State is a public employee.

You have identified the crux of the problem, in a "monkey writing Romeo and Juliet" kind of way

Please continue with your sidelong veiled defense of Hillary- it's amusing

(especially coming from such a nuanced thoughtful moderate)

Post by **kalm** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:19 am

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:Hey guys, Hillary is a successful politician!

"WTF!!!!!! AGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!

The Secretary of State is a public employee.

You have identified the crux of the problem, in a "monkey writing Romeo and Juliet" kind of way

Please continue with your sidelong veiled defense of Hillary- it's amusing

(especially coming from such a nuanced thoughtful moderate)

Of course I've identified it. You're almost there now, and I'm proud of your efforts!

Post by **kalm** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:21 am

CAA Flagship wrote:
kalm wrote:
It's politics, lying is a skill. It's cute that you think it isn't.
No. Spinning and deflecting is a skill. Lying is easy.

I hate dishonesty! That's why I support Christie!

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:23 am

kalm wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: No. Spinning and deflecting is a skill. Lying is easy.
I hate dishonesty! That's why I support Christie!

Do you have dirt? Show me.

Post by **Ivytalk** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:28 am

Lesbians everywhere in the guvmint!

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:44 am

CAA Flagship wrote:
kalm wrote:
You know I can't stand her either but she's clearly more competent within the current system of government than anyone else. I can admit that. I just happen to not care for the current system.

Now, tell me how you were a Christie supporter and how he was going to really be different...Change, Hope...and all that...
"Probably the Most Competent Candidate". That's what you called Clinton.
What is the support for this belief? She has no significant governing experience.

If I was responsible for hiring a CEO of a large company, I would be interested in looking at people that were either #2's or #3's in large companies, or CEO's at smaller companies. We, as voters, have the responsibility of choosing the CEO of the biggest company on earth. Why would I choose a department manager (who did not perform all that well) over someone with quality CEO experience?

Because there isn't that much difference between them?

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:44 am

Ivytalk wrote:Lesbians everywhere in the guvmint!

I have a friend from Beirut..

Post by **Ivytalk** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:41 pm

houndawg wrote:
Ivytalk wrote:Lesbians everywhere in the guvmint!
I have a friend from Beirut..

Very good, Uncle Houndy!

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:57 pm

houndawg wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: "Probably the Most Competent Candidate". That's what you called Clinton.
What is the support for this belief? She has no significant governing experience.

If I was responsible for hiring a CEO of a large company, I would be interested in looking at people that were either #2's or #3's in large companies, or CEO's at smaller companies. We, as voters, have the responsibility of choosing the CEO of the biggest company on earth. Why would I choose a department manager (who did not perform all that well) over someone with quality CEO experience?
Because there isn't that much difference between them?

Please elaborate. I could use a good laugh.

Post by **andy7171** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:05 pm

More of this...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2o1aBZ9Ahc[/youtube]

Post by **Ivytalk** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:44 pm

andy7171 wrote:More of this...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2o1aBZ9Ahc[/youtube]

Ah, deport them both -- to Benghazi!!

BUT BENGHAZI!

Feeling better now!

Post by **SDHornet** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:27 pm

I like how kalm has trolled the people responding in this thread.

Because anyone
with a brain knows
hilldog is the worst option
of them all...

Spoiler: show: Anyone see what I did there? I channeled my inner cleets.

Post by **ASUG8** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:36 pm

SDHornet wrote:I like how kalm has trolled the people responding in this thread.

Because anyone
with a brain knows
hilldog is the worst option
of them all...

Spoiler: show
Anyone see what I did there? I channeled my inner cleets.

Leave the haikus to the hippie from Seattle.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:38 pm

CAA Flagship wrote:
kalm wrote:
I hate dishonesty! That's why I support Christie!
Do you have dirt? Show me.

kal-my, come out to play-yay.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwwY9y6O3hw[/youtube]

Post by **SDHornet** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:49 pm

ASUG8 wrote:
SDHornet wrote:I like how kalm has trolled the people responding in this thread.

Because anyone
with a brain knows
hilldog is the worst option
of them all...

Spoiler: show
Anyone see what I did there? I channeled my inner cleets.
Leave the haikus to the hippie from Seattle.

I was bored, I tried.

Post by **kalm** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:09 pm

CAA Flagship wrote:
kalm wrote:
I hate dishonesty! That's why I support Christie!
Do you have dirt? Show me.

You're really asking me to find examples where Christie has been dishonest?

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:11 pm

kalm wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: Do you have dirt? Show me.
You're really asking me to find examples where Christie has been dishonest?

Yes. And not broken campaign promises. Flat out lies.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:19 pm

CAA Flagship wrote:
kalm wrote:
You're really asking me to find examples where Christie has been dishonest?
Yes. And not broken campaign promises. Flat out lies.

"I didn't polish off that box of Krispy Kremes while no one was looking".

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

Re: What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?