What can we expect from a Hilldog administration?

[CAA Flagship]

Yes. And not broken campaign promises. Flat out lies.

"I didn't polish off that box of Krispy Kremes while no one was looking".

A response that I expect from the tolerant left.

[Grizalltheway]

"I didn't polish off that box of Krispy Kremes while no one was looking".

A response that I expect from the tolerant left.

Here you go, Francis. Try to lighten up while you're reading it.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... he_is.html

[kalm]

You're really asking me to find examples where Christie has been dishonest?

Yes. And not broken campaign promises. Flat out lies.

Nice qualifier. Broken campaign promises aren't dishonest...

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/201 ... _he_l.html

[UNI88]

Mostly lies and incompetence.

What's funny is she's probably the most competent candidate we've had in our lifetimes. Try and figure THAT out.

SOS, Senator, 1st Lady? How would you rate her as SOS? Gubernatorial experience trumps Senate experience 99% of the time. She was definitely a very involved 1st Lady but her health care initiative was DOA. Yes you can learn from your mistakes but typically there is evidence of that learning in future successes. What are her successes? She's a serial politician/insider/liar with a resume long on titles and short on results. If her cv/resume listed her accomplishments rather than her responsibilities it would be more than a little bare.

IMO, Kasich is the most qualified candidate left standing in 2016. Mitt was definitely more qualified despite his lack of charisma.

[CAA Flagship]

Yes. And not broken campaign promises. Flat out lies.

Nice qualifier. Broken campaign promises aren't dishonest...

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/201 ... _he_l.html

I said that because
a) Every candidate does it
b) Sometimes you just can't get it done because of the Legislature or lack of appropriations, and
c) I said so.

[kalm]

What's funny is she's probably the most competent candidate we've had in our lifetimes. Try and figure THAT out.

SOS, Senator, 1st Lady? How would you rate her as SOS? Gubernatorial experience trumps Senate experience 99% of the time. She was definitely a very involved 1st Lady but her health care initiative was DOA. Yes you can learn from your mistakes but typically there is evidence of that learning in future successes. What are her successes? She's a serial politician/insider/liar with a resume long on titles and short on results. If her cv/resume listed her accomplishments rather than her responsibilities it would be more than a little bare.

IMO, Kasich is the most qualified candidate left standing in 2016. Mitt was definitely more qualified despite his lack of charisma.

Quit ruining my fun...

[CAA Flagship]

Yes. And not broken campaign promises. Flat out lies.

Nice qualifier. Broken campaign promises aren't dishonest...

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/201 ... _he_l.html

By the way, did you read through this article?
I can guarantee that he could probably give a reasonable explanation on all of those (except maybe the gift thing ). A lot of that is contextual.

[CAA Flagship]

A response that I expect from the tolerant left.

Here you go, Francis. Try to lighten up while you're reading it.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... he_is.html

As with kalm's article, much of this is contextual.

I still don't see lies to the level of Clinton's.

[kalm]

Here you go, Francis. Try to lighten up while you're reading it.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... he_is.html

As with kalm's article, much of this is contextual.

I still don't see lies to the level of Clinton's.

But neither of us is defending Clinton or claiming that she's honest.

[CAA Flagship]

As with kalm's article, much of this is contextual.

I still don't see lies to the level of Clinton's.

But neither of us is defending Clinton or claiming that she's honest.

Because she is not defendable. Much of it has been proven with videos and emails.
You and GATW pulled up two articles from lefty journalists that have had a hard on for a Republican Governor and all they came up with is contextual BS.
Is he squeaky clean? No, but I don't think the people he serves have suffered because of it.

[Grizalltheway]

Here you go, Francis. Try to lighten up while you're reading it.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... he_is.html

As with kalm's article, much of this is contextual.

I still don't see lies to the level of Clinton's.

Ooh, sorry. The answer we were looking for was "he's evolved".

[kalm]

But neither of us is defending Clinton or claiming that she's honest.

Because she is not defendable. Much of it has been proven with videos and emails.
You and GATW pulled up two articles from lefty journalists that have had a hard on for a Republican Governor and all they came up with is contextual BS.
Is he squeaky clean? No, but I don't think the people he serves have suffered because of it.

I didn't say she was defendable from a perspective of honesty. I agree she's dishonest.

It was you riding the high horse of honesty that I questioned.

[Grizalltheway]

Because she is not defendable. Much of it has been proven with videos and emails.
You and GATW pulled up two articles from lefty journalists that have had a hard on for a Republican Governor and all they came up with is contextual BS.
Is he squeaky clean? No, but I don't think the people he serves have suffered because of it.

I didn't say she was defendable from a perspective of honesty. I agree she's dishonest.

It was you riding the high horse of honesty that I questioned.

Seriously, this is a Jersey politician we're talking about. Next he's going to claim that ODU plays great defense.

[89Hen]

Other than that, there will be mostly whining, moaning, pissing, pining, complaining, ragging, bitching, blaming, investigating, crying, peeing, poo pooing, verping, and nocturnal dripping by all the worshipers of the late, great Reagan administration, which largely never happened.

Nailed it Wedgie... well except for which side will be doing it.

[CID1990]

Other than that, there will be mostly whining, moaning, pissing, pining, complaining, ragging, bitching, blaming, investigating, crying, peeing, poo pooing, verping, and nocturnal dripping by all the worshipers of the late, great Reagan administration, which largely never happened.

Nailed it Wedgie... well except for which side will be doing it.

The comprehensive body of work on this forum makes for some excellent necroposting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ivytalk]

Nailed it Wedgie... well except for which side will be doing it.

The comprehensive body of work on this forum makes for some excellent necroposting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Indeed it does. Who is this Wedgie, anyway?

[JoltinJoe]

Who is this Wedgie, anyway?

Sends his best to all.