Intervene in Syria or no?
- Pwns
- Level4
- Posts: 7273
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Intervene in Syria or no?
The official CS.com poll.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Will you be providing the results to Congress?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
I think we should be able to choose more than one option.
- Pwns
- Level4
- Posts: 7273
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
FWIW, 80% of Americans oppose intervention.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/09/politics/ ... ?hpt=hp_t1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/09/politics/ ... ?hpt=hp_t1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
-
No
It's a good thing Romney didn't get in and we reelected the peace loving Obama administration
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/02/biden ... z2ePa4qhWJ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
No
It's a good thing Romney didn't get in and we reelected the peace loving Obama administration
Sept. 2, 2012, YORK, Pa. (AP) — Vice President Joe Biden said Sunday that Republican rival Mitt Romney is “ready to go to war in Syria and Iran” while hurting the middle class.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/02/biden ... z2ePa4qhWJ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. Al Swearengen
http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/childr ... bronco.wav" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/childr ... bronco.wav" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter
- Posts: 5236
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Seems like Russia is stepping to the forefront on this.
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/09/09/wa ... -on-syria/
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/09/09/wa ... -on-syria/
Yet watch Obama take all the credit.However, Russia might be ready to diffuse the situation between Syria and the United States.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov vowed to push Syria, a Russian ally, to place its chemical weapons under international control and then dismantle them to avert U.S. air strikes.
“If the establishment of international control over chemical weapons in that country would allow avoiding strikes, we will immediately start working with Damascus,” Lavrov said. “We are calling on the Syrian leadership to not only agree on placing chemical weapons storage sites under international control, but also on its subsequent destruction and fully joining the treaty on prohibition of chemical weapons,”
The move by Russia came a few hours after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that Syria could resolve the crisis by turning over his entire arsenal of chemical weapons to the international community by the end of the week.
Syria has reportedly said that it welcomed the proposal from Russia, but hasn’t decided on a course of action as of noon Monday.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Ah yes, the benevolent Russians, just looking out for the best interests of the rest of the world.DSUrocks07 wrote:Seems like Russia is stepping to the forefront on this.
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/09/09/wa ... -on-syria/
Yet watch Obama take all the credit.However, Russia might be ready to diffuse the situation between Syria and the United States.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov vowed to push Syria, a Russian ally, to place its chemical weapons under international control and then dismantle them to avert U.S. air strikes.
“If the establishment of international control over chemical weapons in that country would allow avoiding strikes, we will immediately start working with Damascus,” Lavrov said. “We are calling on the Syrian leadership to not only agree on placing chemical weapons storage sites under international control, but also on its subsequent destruction and fully joining the treaty on prohibition of chemical weapons,”
The move by Russia came a few hours after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that Syria could resolve the crisis by turning over his entire arsenal of chemical weapons to the international community by the end of the week.
Syria has reportedly said that it welcomed the proposal from Russia, but hasn’t decided on a course of action as of noon Monday.
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Who in the world voted "yes" for this? Why do we care about a few hundred dead people due to gas when we've let 100,000+ die already without doing a thing?
If muslins want to kill each other, how can that be a bad thing? The world population is too high already.
If muslins want to kill each other, how can that be a bad thing? The world population is too high already.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
I'm a no on this. Especially since we've been telling Assad exactly what our plan is and I'm pretty sure we'll just launch some missiles targeting places where missiles used to be. Seems to me like a pretty stupid $350 Million boonedoggle.
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter
- Posts: 5236
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Since when has America done the same?Grizalltheway wrote:Ah yes, the benevolent Russians, just looking out for the best interests of the rest of the world.DSUrocks07 wrote:Seems like Russia is stepping to the forefront on this.
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/09/09/wa ... -on-syria/
Yet watch Obama take all the credit.
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
WWI, WWII, and every humanitarian and natural disaster come to mind.DSUrocks07 wrote:Since when has America done the same?Grizalltheway wrote:
Ah yes, the benevolent Russians, just looking out for the best interests of the rest of the world.
We usually have Marines handing out MREs on the streets before the local ruler decides to come out of his mansion.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter
- Posts: 5236
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Oh yeah, I forgot, we're the "good guys".93henfan wrote:WWI, WWII, and every humanitarian and natural disaster come to mind.DSUrocks07 wrote:
Since when has America done the same?
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Just because we've had two of the most inept presidents in our history serve back to back does not make us bad guys.DSUrocks07 wrote:Oh yeah, I forgot, we're the "good guys".93henfan wrote:
WWI, WWII, and every humanitarian and natural disaster come to mind.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Gore lost to Bush. We are sitting on 1 in a row.93henfan wrote:Just because we've had two of the most inept presidents in our history serve back to back does not make us bad guys.DSUrocks07 wrote:
Oh yeah, I forgot, we're the "good guys".
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Is that an App State word?ASUG8 wrote:I'm a no on this. Especially since we've been telling Assad exactly what our plan is and I'm pretty sure we'll just launch some missiles targeting places where missiles used to be. Seems to me like a pretty stupid $350 Million boonedoggle.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
- ASUMountaineer
- Level4
- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Moscow is running circles around our Nobel Peace Prize winner.DSUrocks07 wrote:Seems like Russia is stepping to the forefront on this.
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/09/09/wa ... -on-syria/
Yet watch Obama take all the credit.However, Russia might be ready to diffuse the situation between Syria and the United States.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov vowed to push Syria, a Russian ally, to place its chemical weapons under international control and then dismantle them to avert U.S. air strikes.
“If the establishment of international control over chemical weapons in that country would allow avoiding strikes, we will immediately start working with Damascus,” Lavrov said. “We are calling on the Syrian leadership to not only agree on placing chemical weapons storage sites under international control, but also on its subsequent destruction and fully joining the treaty on prohibition of chemical weapons,”
The move by Russia came a few hours after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that Syria could resolve the crisis by turning over his entire arsenal of chemical weapons to the international community by the end of the week.
Syria has reportedly said that it welcomed the proposal from Russia, but hasn’t decided on a course of action as of noon Monday.
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
- ASUMountaineer
- Level4
- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Yes, though it's usually spelled "NC A&T."Ivytalk wrote:Is that an App State word?ASUG8 wrote:I'm a no on this. Especially since we've been telling Assad exactly what our plan is and I'm pretty sure we'll just launch some missiles targeting places where missiles used to be. Seems to me like a pretty stupid $350 Million boonedoggle.
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
-
- Level5
- Posts: 10239
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: South Carolina St
- A.K.A.: SC State
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
At the beginning the GOP voted yes.How about Catholics killing each other?93henfan wrote:Who in the world voted "yes" for this? Why do we care about a few hundred dead people due to gas when we've let 100,000+ die already without doing a thing?
If muslins want to kill each other, how can that be a bad thing? The world population is too high already.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
Since you stated that as a fact, would you care to list the names and party affiliation of those who voted yes and those who voted no?dal4018 wrote:At the beginning the GOP voted yes.How about Catholics killing each other?93henfan wrote:Who in the world voted "yes" for this? Why do we care about a few hundred dead people due to gas when we've let 100,000+ die already without doing a thing?
If muslins want to kill each other, how can that be a bad thing? The world population is too high already.
In the meantime, you might want to look up what Kerry and Pelosi are saying about intervention.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
I guess I inserted the extra "e" out of habit.Ivytalk wrote:Is that an App State word?ASUG8 wrote:I'm a no on this. Especially since we've been telling Assad exactly what our plan is and I'm pretty sure we'll just launch some missiles targeting places where missiles used to be. Seems to me like a pretty stupid $350 Million boonedoggle.
- death dealer
- Level3
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:49 am
- I am a fan of: Appalachian Mud Squids
- A.K.A.: Contaminated
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
6.93% of Americans think we should fire the president into Syria.
Dear lord... please allow this dangerous combination of hair spary, bat slobber, and D.O.T. four automatic transmission fluid to excite my mind, occupy my spirits, and enrage my body, provoking me to kick any man or woman in the back of the head regardless of what he or she has or has not done unto me. All my Best, Earlie Cuyler.
- GrizFanStuckInUtah
- Level3
- Posts: 3758
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:27 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
They have already tested 200 pound bombs, they aren't very effective.....we should have known that.death dealer wrote:6.93% of Americans think we should fire the president into Syria.
-Go Griz!
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans.
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans.
- LeadBolt
- Level3
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:44 pm
- I am a fan of: William & Mary
- Location: Botetourt
Re: Intervene in Syria or no?
This is a lose, lose situation. Nothing to be gained by intervening.
Besides, the environmental impact study shows the longer the war goes on the more people will be killed, thereby reducing emissions into the atmosphere and reducing global warming. Letting them kill themselves off is the green thing to do and is earth friendly...
Besides, the environmental impact study shows the longer the war goes on the more people will be killed, thereby reducing emissions into the atmosphere and reducing global warming. Letting them kill themselves off is the green thing to do and is earth friendly...