Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Well, other people would still use it and it would still impact the global market for oil. And people do have things called planes and other modes of transportation so it's not like we can physically contain and isolate the Middle East from interacting with the rest of the world. And besides, frack...

I don't believe the left supports Islamic fundamentalism. As UNI said, sometimes people are so strident and enthusiastic in their resistance to anything possibly White or Western that they'll actually say they're pro-Hamas or pro-Intifada, but I think those who do that are just more interested in s...

I mentioned to a friend of mine after the Nuggets/Lakers series that Denver can't keep getting down by double-digits against Minnesota as the Wolves are a much better team that the Lakers and it is showing. The lack of focus the Nuggets have had so far in both the Laker series and this one should b...

Opinion: The antisemitic lie at the heart of too many campus protests Claims that Israel has been committing a genocide of Palestinians date to long before October 7. Yet the population of Gaza was estimated to be less than 400,000 when Israel captured the territory from Egypt in a war against mult...

I think there are people on the left who foolishly support Islamic fundamentalism. There are pseudo-progressives who support anything that they believe opposes white, western colonialism and Islamic fundamentalism checks all of those boxes. They do this despite the reality that Islamic fundamentali...

https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/nRfn6Iv7rX_zRMZZhYVwwg--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTQ1MDtjZj13ZWJw/https://media.zenfs.com/en/insider_articles_922/fef042c929499e9044cf580eaa6ad215 Donald Van fucking Shitsinpants couldn't keep his mushroom dick in his pants ... :lol: trump is so well though...

Majority of people are smart enough to see that this is politically timed lawfare. Clearly you 2 aren’t one of them. 1 or 2 cases might be lawfare. The documents case and the cases around his attempts to STEAL THE 2020 ELECTION are absolutely worth pursuing. Maybe if his daddy hadn't bailed him out...

Hey, I don't disagree at all that justices are selected at the start based on their perceived ideology/jurisprudence leaning - of course they are. Hence why you get different justices depending on the President picking them. But once they're there, barring an impeachment and removal (only ever been...

The Colorado case was simple and straightforward. I told you months before that ruling that it was going to be 9-0 but you wanted to believe the folks who were so anti-Trump that they could contort any law in any way to block him. In addition, they had to proceed quickly on that one because after C...

Like we already talked about before, this isn't a yes/no, magic 8-ball decision. They're writing stuff that will impact the Presidency for the next 100 years or more. Once it got to this level, it was more than about just Trump. If Smith wanted something quick, he shouldn't have appealed in this wa...

Strawmen stuff again when you have trouble debating the question at hand. Starting to be a trend with you. As for the strawman topic, I've never defended Jan 6th people like that and I fully support any and all prosecution of them for their activities that day. Again, back to the topic you seem to ...

The truth is often painful but unfortunately its still the truth. :coffee: I don't remember you springing to Hillary's defense over the past decade or so that she's been getting hit a lot harder than that right here. :coffee: Eh…next thing you know he’ll be describing J6 participants as tourists. A...

Even in satire, the fact that you can type all of that and hit submit is appalling. Be better than that, if you can. :coffee: The truth is often painful but unfortunately its still the truth. :coffee: I don't remember you springing to Hillary's defense over the past decade or so that she's been get...

Again, if there was real evidence of corruption (i.e. a judge changing a vote to suit a benefactor) then it would be prosecuted, both politically (impeachment) and legally (prosecution). All you have is innuendo, biased perceptions, and political talking points. Thomas, for all of his faults, is ac...

Well, if you think so. There's literally no evidence of corruption of any of the justices (questionable activity tied directly to unusual behavior/decision) - heck, given Thomas's wife's activities you would think there would be something that would tie him to those things and we seem not to have f...

Well, if you think so. There's literally no evidence of corruption of any of the justices (questionable activity tied directly to unusual behavior/decision) - heck, given Thomas's wife's activities you would think there would be something that would tie him to those things and we seem not to have f...

The Colorado case was simple and straightforward. I told you months before that ruling that it was going to be 9-0 but you wanted to believe the folks who were so anti-Trump that they could contort any law in any way to block him. In addition, they had to proceed quickly on that one because after C...

They granted cert because Smith made it a big deal to petition the Court and to refuse such a big case and a public ask like that would've generated probably even more howling from the left. Basically, it was too big of a deal to ignore. Taking a couple of months (they'll probably decide in June) i...

They granted cert because Smith made it a big deal to petition the Court and to refuse such a big case and a public ask like that would've generated probably even more howling from the left. Basically, it was too big of a deal to ignore. Taking a couple of months (they'll probably decide in June) i...

It didn't even need to be at SCOTUS right now, that was Smith trying to fast track it rather than follow the normal route. Once he petitioned them to take it up I can't see them not taking it. With that said, this is bigger than Trump, so it's going to need a little thought in this. It's not someth...

Or, in this case, go over what Trump is accused of and going action by action as to whether it is covered by official duty or not. There isn't a blanket decision one way or the other that addresses this. That's why SCOTUS will probably remand it back to the district court to sort through the detail...

It's not an all or nothing thing. Clearly Trump's view of absolute immunity is silly and it's not being realistically debated by anyone other than Trump. So the question does come down to what's covered and what isn't covered. The Constitution, in broad terms, lays out what the President's duties a...

The text of the Constitution broadly lists out what the President does. Those things would presumably be protected then. If he does other thing outside of that, then they wouldn't be protected. It also brings up the question then of suing the President specifically or suing the government as a whol...

Is pro Hamas. The Palestinian people OVERWHELMINGLY elected Hamas, and overwhelmingly support Hamas. In WWII in the US if you were pro Germany them you were pro NAZI. Wait…are we shifting this from US campuses to Palestinians now? Or are you implying that any support of the Palestinians by anyone i...

I'm curious where any of this concern over originalist principles over Presidential immunity comes from? I didn't hear a lot of backtracking or cognitive dissonance in last week's SCOTUS hearing. It's pretty clear that Trump's laughable/troubling idea of complete immunity has no chance of standing,...