<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1st Round Playoff Breakdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/2009/11/1st-round-playoff-breakdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/2009/11/1st-round-playoff-breakdown/</link>
	<description>FCS Football &#124; Team Directory &#124; Stadiums &#124; Schedules &#124; Forums</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAPPYAPPY</title>
		<link>http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/2009/11/1st-round-playoff-breakdown/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>HAPPYAPPY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/?p=2717#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Randy - 1 down, Montana next!  GO APPS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy &#8211; 1 down, Montana next!  GO APPS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/2009/11/1st-round-playoff-breakdown/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/?p=2717#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Big Sky got a little respect.  I disagreed with one of your earlier posts on who you thought would get the 2nd bid out of the Big Sky.  Weber St, although losing, played very close to Colorado St and Wyoming, which in my opinion is better than getting a win against some low level FCS team.  

Montana might have one of the toughest matchups a #1 seed as ever been stuck with. SDSU is no joke.  The thing about Montana&#039;s past early round playoffs success is that it&#039;s usually a team from the south coming up to play in cold, snowy weather in Missoula.  SDSU could careless about weather conditions.

I think App St is the favorite as well, but they have a very tough road.  If I&#039;m not mistaken, don&#039;t they have Richmond and Montana on their side? Both would be on the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Big Sky got a little respect.  I disagreed with one of your earlier posts on who you thought would get the 2nd bid out of the Big Sky.  Weber St, although losing, played very close to Colorado St and Wyoming, which in my opinion is better than getting a win against some low level FCS team.  </p>
<p>Montana might have one of the toughest matchups a #1 seed as ever been stuck with. SDSU is no joke.  The thing about Montana&#8217;s past early round playoffs success is that it&#8217;s usually a team from the south coming up to play in cold, snowy weather in Missoula.  SDSU could careless about weather conditions.</p>
<p>I think App St is the favorite as well, but they have a very tough road.  If I&#8217;m not mistaken, don&#8217;t they have Richmond and Montana on their side? Both would be on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

